PoetryCircle
ContemporaryPoetryForum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.


« PoetryCircleThe WritingFront pageFront page archive • Topic: The Litter Box Principle »
ThreadTools

Print







 (Read 3423 times) [1]

  The Litter Box Principle
« on: April 22, 2006, 02:46:04 PM » by Ronald Hulshizer
Don’t go all turtle on me here, but
did you know there was a time when people
actually had sex just because they got the itch.
They frolicked in the thermal pools for fun,
and did it in the dirt because it felt fantastic, but

some uptight ass had to come along
and fuck up the equilibrium by formulating
some radical new concept called romantic love
that had young people drinking hemlock
in the painful wake of its passing.

Too many others used it as a convenience,
a way of satisfying their own grasping
desires, and overnight, pussy went from
pleasant pleasure to a tradable commodity;
food, furs, bigger, better, bullshit.

You can bet your burro that whoever
came up with that sorry idea had already
cornered the market on glitter and just
needed an outlet. The river of life is always
slowed by a logjam of self-serving fools.

I don’t know what I don’t know, but what
I do know is that life should have been
formulated on the principle of a cat’s litter box:

Just scoop the shit out and start over again.




Logged

  Re: The Litter Box Principal
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2006, 12:59:47 AM » by Desiree Wright
There are some good lines in this, Ron. I enjoyed reading it.

D
Logged

  Re: The Litter Box Principal
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2006, 01:09:06 PM » by HGvonPaulis
Ron,

At first read, I thought that the line "Just scoop the shit out and start over again." was in ref to your opening subject, a take on matter-of-fact hauling ashes, but on second reading, I thought it referred to starting civilization over again with a better take on how it should be. So, if explanation is warranted, which is it? I think your words are holding together in excellent form; it's most pleasing to me to read a work that causes me to think (and I agree with the sentiment; not that that's a factor).

HG

Logged

  Re: The Litter Box Principal
« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2006, 01:53:35 PM » by kgerick
I hate to be all english teacher about it, but I'm pretty sure it should be "principle"... no? the only reason I bring it up is because of meaning, and if it is supposed to be "principal" than I'm not sure I'm getting the subtleness.
Logged

  Re: The Litter Box Principle
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2006, 02:24:36 PM » by Ronald Hulshizer
HG, You were more or less right on both counts.  It's a cause and effect thing.  No one can seem to let a simple pleasure lie without constantly twisting it to conform to their own ideals.   :'(

Kgerick:  Thank God for English teachers. :)

Logged

  letting the cat out of the...
« Reply #5 on: April 24, 2006, 05:08:38 PM » by CEO
Ronald H.:

These two strophes / stanzas seem to carry the poem's core--

"some uptight ass had to come along
and fuck up the equilibrium by formulating
some radical new concept called romantic love
that had young people drinking hemlock
in the painful wake of its passing.

Too many others used it as a convenience,
a way of satisfying their own grasping
desires, and overnight, pussy went from
pleasant pleasure to a tradable commodity;
food, furs, bigger, better bullshit
."

While the "f" and "p" words (in the quoted stropes / stanzas, respectively) are expletive in nature and therefore hold potential distraction, in context, they are deceptively non-gratuitous.  The "p" word is especially well-placed as it ties in nicely with the title's "kitty litter" delivery. 

The preceding and following pieces of this poem may be served by expansion from its solid core [which, as stated, seems to be S2, S3].

CEO
Logged

  Re: The Litter Box Principle
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2006, 05:23:13 PM » by Jay Dougherty
Indeed, some very good lines in this. The tempo carries right through to the end. Nice read.

This one: "food, furs, bigger, better bullshit." I almost want a comma before the last word, forcing the line to end with an exclamation rather than another item in a list. Oh, and maybe a colon instead of a semicolon before the last line?

But that's just a thought. Fun! Thanks for contributing this.
Logged

I do not like to write. I like to have written. --Gloria Steinam

  Re: The Litter Box Principle
« Reply #7 on: April 25, 2006, 06:39:14 PM » by maggie flanagan-wilkie
Where to begin? The laughter, the head noding in complete agreement,
the admiration of art and craft, the big "Oh yeah!" as the poem ended.

You get caught up in message which I think shows your skill, Ron.

I enjoyed this alot.

Maggie




Logged

  Re: The Litter Box Principle
« Reply #8 on: April 26, 2006, 04:52:23 PM » by Rob Taylor

nice. refreshing more than anything.

thanks.
Logged

  Re: The Litter Box Principle
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2006, 12:17:06 PM » by Lynn Doiron
Ditto to comments above.  The voice carries right the way through.  Really enjoyed that listing line with the comma between better and bullshit.  Bullshit becoming another item in the listing was just a surprise -- I do enjoy a surprise every now and again.  And this whole poem was enjoyed.  thanks, lynn
Logged

My blogs:
http://lwww.lynndoiron.wordpress.com for memoir/journal/poetry

 (Read 3423 times) [1]
Jump to:  
MemberTools

Home
Help
Calendar
Members List
Statistics
Login
Register



LatestNews

Like us on Facebook!

SiteStats

191350 Posts
18135 Topics
1518 Members
Latest Member: William F Dougherty


Support PoetryCircle








PoetryCircle | Powered by SMF 1.1.15.
© 2005, Simple Machines. All Rights Reserved.

Simplicity design by BlocWeb