In these days of self-publishing, once a writer puts a work "publicly online", it might as well be considered to be published. A writer today must make the call of which avenue to pursue with any given piece of writing: to go online and essentially self-publish, or to go through the controlled channels, be they editor/publisher-controlled online, paper-based or a hybrid.
I would contend that the very structure of the PC boards signifies that any work submitted to the submit board should be considered by the author to have been published. PC has a workshop board distinct from the submit/picks boards. If folks want to be able to claim that they were "workshopping" something, then it should have been placed in the workshop, and not submitted. Work can reside indefinitely on the PC submit board, effectively in limbo. Tacit rejection by not being "picked" is indefensible, when there is a "reject board". Finally, work appearing on the submit/picks boards is returned in Google search results, even with just a few unique words from a poem as the search criteria. Work on PC submit/picks boards is truly "out there on the net". It would behoove the writer to consider it to be publishing, when submitting a piece to the submit board (not the workshop).
Even if one does not agree with the above, and might prefer to consider work posted to the PC submit board to be merely submitted, and not published, that fact that a lot of mags/pubs (online or paper) do not accept simultaneous submissions should be taken into consideration.